comment

Address Poisoning Costs 140 ETH (~$636k) — Recovery Unlikely, Prevention Critical

I report that a user fell victim to an address-poisoning attack and accidentally sent 140 ETH, a loss of roughly $636,000. I find this a stark example of how small UX or security failures can lead to catastrophic losses in crypto.

I believe the attack likely involved clipboard or browser-based address replacement, malicious extensions, or a lookalike ENS/QR vector. Recovery chances are low once funds are moved, but immediate tracing and reporting can help if the funds are still on-chain and unmixed.

I urge others to treat this as a reminder to always verify addresses using multiple methods, send test transactions for new payees, use hardware wallets and address whitelists, keep software updated, and report incidents promptly to wallet providers and law enforcement.

Source available for registered users Sign Up Free

Analysis

The incident points to clipboard/browser-based address substitution or lookalike name attacks; once funds are forwarded or routed through mixers the probability of recovery is low. Immediate on-chain ...

Recommendation

Do not rely on copy-paste addresses: use hardware wallets, address whitelists, ENS with careful verification, QR scanning from trusted sources, and always send a small test amount first. If you are a ...

Disclaimer

The Analysis and recommendations provided are for informational purposes only. Any investment decisions should be made at your own risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

You might also be interested in: