comment

BCH Pool Estimates vs Actual Payouts — Check Fee, Payout Type and Share Acceptance

I notice your BCH pool shows a higher “estimated per day” payout than the payments you actually receive. That difference is usually not a bug but a mix of how the pool calculates estimates, payout method, fees, and mining variance.

To find the exact profitability, I would compare your miner-reported hashrate to the pool’s effective hashrate, check accepted vs rejected/stale shares, confirm the pool’s payout scheme (PPS / PPLNS / FPPS), subtract the pool fee and any transaction fees, and use network difficulty, block reward and current BCH price to compute expected daily income. Do this over a longer window (7–30 days) to smooth variance.

If the numbers still don’t add up, I would export the pool’s payment history, calculate expected payouts from shares submitted, and contact pool support with miner logs; also use external calculators and monitoring tools to cross-check.

Source available for registered users Sign Up Free

Analysis

Discrepancies usually come from payout method and luck/variance, differences between reported and effective hashrate, stale/rejected shares, pool fees and transaction fees, and short reporting windows...

Recommendation

Compare miner and pool hashrate, review accepted/rejected share counts, confirm payout scheme and fees, compute expected earnings using network difficulty and your effective hashrate over 7–30 days, a...

Disclaimer

The Analysis and recommendations provided are for informational purposes only. Any investment decisions should be made at your own risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

You might also be interested in: