risky

Beware of 0% Fees and Unknown Exchanges: Credibility Matters in Crypto

I question the premise of 0% commissions, because it sounds ridiculous: it implies the market lacks liquidity (you can’t buy or sell unless there’s a buyer), and the exchange wouldn’t earn any revenue anyway.

Secondly, a no-name exchange should not be a scam by default, right? So why did a friend of mine on HTX (also a no-name exchange) manage to cash out CNY, and then his Alipay wallet got blocked?

A no-name exchange stays a no-name because it’s unknown to most users. Even the top exchanges—while they may not offer the lowest fees—still provide clearer security measures and more convenient options for deposits and withdrawals, including P2P transfers.

In short, credibility and liquidity seem to hinge on established security practices and reliable fiat onramps, not just on the allure of zero fees.

Source available for registered users Sign Up Free

Analysis

Contextual factors suggest a tension between the appeal of zero-fee models and the practical requirements of liquidity, security, and fiat access in crypto trading. The claim of 0% commissions implies...

Recommendation

Recommendation 1: Favor exchanges with proven liquidity, robust security measures, and transparent fee structures over models promising zero fees. Prioritize platforms that publish auditable security ...

Disclaimer

The Analysis and recommendations provided are for informational purposes only. Any investment decisions should be made at your own risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

You might also be interested in: