Bitcoin Asset Management: The Reliable Choice Over Ordinals

I'm curious about what else Ordinals can provide beyond the usual markets for satoshis and the risk of accidental asset spending. Unlike Ordinals, traditional asset management tools like stamps and Counterparty have a proven track record of over a decade, operating natively on Bitcoin, providing full transparency and independence from trusted third parties. These platforms support features such as issuance of editions, dispensers, dividends (airdrops), Bitcoin-native decentralized exchanges, and compatibility with both legacy and SegWit addresses. Your assets are securely stored within Bitcoin's core structure, specifically in the UTXO transaction set, ensuring persistent custody. Furthermore, each of the approximately 22,000 Bitcoin nodes maintains a copy of these assets, offering true decentralization. In contrast, Ordinals are only stored on around 5% of nodes and are decreasing daily, which raises concerns about their long-term durability. Overall, I see traditional Bitcoin-native asset management systems as more reliable and secure for preserving and managing digital assets composed of Bitcoin's native features. As such, I believe these mechanisms provide a more trustworthy and stable foundation for asset management in the Bitcoin ecosystem.