Critique of Mandatory Token Utilization and Comparison to Stock Rights

It is typically not well-received to present an idea as a mandatory obligation for others. It resembles asking them to assume a risk or adopt a strategy for the benefit of the company or community. Furthermore, comparing a utility token like B2M to company stocks is not appropriate. Stocks signify ownership and rights within a company, whereas B2M functions as a utility token providing discounts, advantages, and uses within the Bit2Me ecosystem. Even if it were voluntary, imagine applying such a measure: like telling all B2M holders that a percentage of their tokens will be frozen for a year for the community's good. This wouldn't seem fair if it isn't a choice each individual makes. In this context, every individual is free to hold, use in Earn, spend with the Card, or participate in Space Center missions. That is precisely the essence of B2M: providing real utilities without imposing anything on anyone. Thank you for sharing your idea and opening this kind of reflection. Best regards.