strong buy
Crypto.com's Contradictory Responses on Fraudulent Transactions and Virtual Card Usage
Although a dispute was requested, no refund was ever asked for. It is assumed that if a refund were to occur, Visa or any fraud protection insurance would handle it. Crypto.com only states that they do not have a valid right to intervene, yet they recommend adding the new virtual card to Apple Pay in order to use it. Initially, they claimed there was no valid right to claim because the fraudulent transactions were made through Apple Pay, and later, they suggest adding the virtual card to Apple Pay to use it. These contradictory statements are quite perplexing.
Source available for registered users Sign Up Free
AI Analysis
The situation presents a clear case of conflicting messaging from Crypto.com regarding fraud disputes and virtual card usage. Initially, the user states that they only requested a dispute, not a refun...
AI Recommendation
Given the contradictory communication from Crypto.com, it's advisable to approach this situation with caution. The user should consider consulting with legal or consumer protection agencies if recover...
Disclaimer
The AI analysis and recommendations provided are for informational purposes only. Any investment decisions should be made at your own risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
You might also be interested in:
partial sell
don't buy