Haven1's Commitment to Long-Term Value and the Need for Consistency in Communication

I understand your viewpoint and agree that committed long-term investors should be rewarded. However, honesty requires acknowledging that Haven1 has shifted its position multiple times, whether in its documents, claims about structure, or tokenomics transparency. For instance, initial documentation indicated that redistribution would benefit locked stakers, but this has since changed. The vesting schedule and tokenomics details remain somewhat unclear, even to presale participants like myself. My intention isn’t to criticize without basis but to emphasize the need for consistency. We believed in the project early on, claimed esH1, and committed to locking it, without dumping or flipping. That demonstrates true alignment. Therefore, all genuine long-term participants—testers, lockers, early buyers, stakers—should be acknowledged fairly. I will continue to seek clarity and fairness, not out of entitlement, but from a principled stand.