HOT ambiguous: on‑chain points exist but token status unresolved — wait for tokenomics
I see conflicting statements: the team presents HOT as a token with on-chain characteristics, yet the founder says it is not launched and only ‘potentially’ subject to an airdrop. In the Telegram wallet they show locked “HOT points” that are recorded as blockchain transactions.
The project team also says a token will likely be needed for long-term economics and validator incentives, but they haven’t decided on user convenience or exact token role. Given the mix of language — “points” vs. “token” — the actual status and mechanics remain unclear.
Analysis
Recommendation
Disclaimer
The Analysis and recommendations provided are for informational purposes only. Any investment decisions should be made at your own risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.