watch
Questioning the Need for a New Token Amid Rebranding Concerns
The author has been somewhat inactive, continuing to hold their assets, and questions the purpose of the new token, especially since ZPAY cannot fulfill that role. They suggest that if the goal is to support the rebranding of the app with a token, rebranding the existing ZPAY token or implementing a 1:1 migration, particularly if creating a new blockchain is involved, would be more straightforward. Managing two tokens and the associated costs appears unnecessary and inefficient.
Source available for registered users Sign Up Free
AI Analysis
The opinion reflects a skepticism towards the creation of a new token in the context of an app rebranding. The critic argues that if the primary reason for introducing a new token is to support the re...
AI Recommendation
Given the concerns raised, it is advisable to evaluate whether a new token is truly necessary or if existing solutions can be adapted. Rebranding or migrating ZPAY to serve the new app's purpose may ...
Disclaimer
The AI analysis and recommendations provided are for informational purposes only. Any investment decisions should be made at your own risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.