comment

Targeted protections make sense for risky coins

This is a solid idea — I recently tested a similar approach myself and found it useful in practice.

Although it runs counter to my preference for universality, I agree there is merit in applying targeted measures to especially "dangerous" coins to limit downside risk.

Source available for registered users Sign Up Free

Analysis

The approach offers pragmatic risk mitigation: it sacrifices strict universality for added safety where token risk is high. My tests suggest meaningful protection against outsized losses, though it re...

Recommendation

Use targeted controls or stricter rules for coins that meet defined high-risk criteria, but keep universality as the default and apply exceptions sparingly with transparent rules and monitoring.

Disclaimer

The Analysis and recommendations provided are for informational purposes only. Any investment decisions should be made at your own risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

You might also be interested in: